Search results

So basically he got nothing, figured. Players won't want to come because we did poor in CL/EL, never gonna happen.

Yea the issue is if we will have the money, WC players will always come to Barcelona, we've seen this script before with us & Madrid. Doesn't matter how poor they get, they will keep their pill.

Would put a week's wage on us being able to sign a few Class players again, if we had the money. Money argument is totally different from, Barcelona being unattractive to class players & coaches, that will require another 7+ years to happen.

Lol tebas & even some Barca fans.

The same players where no one wanted to come here last summer then. I'd take one of those summers again, sign a WC defender & One of the best strikers in the world. After winning the league for the first team in years. Oh wait league titles don't count anymore.

Tebas just be talking.

The same players kinda that came to us last year after getting eliminated from EL I would guess.

UEFA is changing the rules to prevent the optional years from counting, that's what they are doing, as now it counts and if it didn't they would be violating eufa rule. Off to work now.

They are in Europe & to meet fifa rules No optional extension, they don't meet those rules. No CL Try again.

Lol 90% of what you just said. Is all what you think, tuck. Meanwhile the facts are the facts, optional years count.. Period, no about of Talking will change that cold hard fact. Bya.

https://youtu.be/9ud228R5jTo Chelsea signing players to 5 year contracts, with options to extend, to get around FFP. Intent is irrelevant, all that matters is what the maths say when the contract is being signed, which is that it takes into account the optional years, to getting within FFP...

Pep is done with the traditional FB, even though cancelo wasn't even that.

They went around it by adding options to extend, much like Barcelona did with lewa, fifa rules don't allow 8 year contacts, every player they signed, has a club option, which is what are using to minimize on books cost, which is what your entire argument is based on. Age of the players are...

So I guess u riding Chelsea dick for signing players that include options to extend is crap then ? Lol.

I could post a million links to Chelsea spreading contracts, that include club options to minimize cost on books. But I'm done with this debate, as per usual, tuck gonna spin & use alternative facts to make a point. While in reality Lewa cost in spread over 4 years & his argument is dog shit...

Hope he stays. Chelsea starting to piss me off now.

Nerp. Let's me break this down in simple terms, yet also highlights jammay's usual spin all at once. On the books cost are all simple accounting, because a club has $1 on the books for a players transfer, obviously doesn't mean, that's what they are paying to the selling club, Amortization...

Contract is spread over 4 years, much in the same way it is at Chelsea, the club you love to point to, contact on the books is spread over the entire length including club option. As per usual, gotta find a spin to make any of your arguments work.

Jammy had to cut lewa's cost over 3 years to increase the per year hit,it's a lie, the cost will be broken down over 4. Much in the same way, all these players Chelsea signed, the extras 2+ years are all club options to extend, but they spread the cost over the entire 7-8 years contract, not...

Lol