Search results

You didn't watch the game, did you?

Pretty much Bumsi's style. We can't control games when we don't finish our chances. If opposition finish theirs then it's a bad day, if not we can get back by scoring. People look at the final score and take that as the absolute metric. When in fact we didn't dominate until game was out of...

Sure, there are others in first 11 that are overrated. I was talking about the obvious ones.

Half of that team should not start for Barca. Some good results don't change the fact that Balde, Eric, Fort and Victor are all bums. Casado should be bench material for now, not starter.

You and half of barcaforum.

The clinicality in front of opposition goals and offside trap are no longer there to bail us out. His football is one of moments. We might still do well in CL, but we have to have good morale from the league run. Barca is not Madrid, to turn into another animal in CL runs.

As expected, he is nowhere near the club while Laporta is president.

The idiots that compare Rivaldo's beauty with that half-arsed effort from CR in a glorified friendly need to be banned. It's not even about the moment or opposition here. Just take into account all the variables to pull that off and realize it is an outrageous goal. Rivaldo's - back to goal...

?

Xavi got the moves https://vm.tiktok.com/ZNecWEH69/

It's as pointless as you arguing about a computer generated image, which VAR doesn't reproduce correctly most of the times. Going by this logic we should ditch VAR because the system is not there yet when it comes to reproducing the real life scenario 100%. Therefore it makes the decisions taken...

Lewa's foot is perpendicular on goal, Sociedad's cleat is indeed shielding but is not parallel.

Again, good reflex but straight at him. Pena hasn't cost us anything yet, so can't see a motive for him losing his spot.

Sit down and take you meds Picasso. :lol:

Was also using the same logic, but I think what we didn't take into account was that defender's foot is at an angle. Since we don't have clear proof I choose to take VAR as evidence.

Shots were straight at him, the ones he could save. So yeah, did what was asked of him. Dunno about distribution as I haven't watched that.

You are getting worked up for nothing really. Calling the decision a daylight robbery when nothing is clear there. People are emotional because we lost and played badly, nothing to do with VAR robbing us or not.

Blurry pics from afar or some angles that don't help much. I also thought initially that he was onside, but since there is no clear proof to say otherwise we'll have to follow VAR.

Real image? Their boots are of similar color and we don't have some close-up high res photo that makes it clear. As I've said, people don't take into account that the defender's foot is at an angle and not fully on the ground(if it even touches the ground?). The replays and photos that we have...

https://x.com/TheSpecialO_R_C/status/1855710823575904440 I think we got fooled because the defender's foot is not on the ground and at an angle. Lewandowski's foot is planted straight forward and thus sticks out a bit.