No, that's false.
Printable View
To be fair to Koe, team has created lots more chances than the opposition. He was let down by shitty defense + lack of finishing on our side and other teams being more clinical.
Press and fans hate his guts. Koe's been catching a lot of flack for his mulish persona but maybe it's just a Dutch thing and him being very direct rubs people the wrong way.
If sacking him means paying an early breach fee, then best give the guy another chance and allocate money to upgrade CBs.
Now as for the successor, it's Xavi for me.
Surround him with experts in areas where he's still learning. Same goes for Koe btw., we sure could use an expert striker trainer to improve our finishing :whistle:
And bring in an master in the dark arts, time wasting, technical fouls, yadi yo... the way we conceded some of 'em leads recently were na?ve to a fault.
Far fetch alternative but could ask Lucho to come back for a year or 2 and have Xavi share the load and learn under him.
One thing though, whoever comes, better have a thick rhino skin. At least with Xavi, can imagine the press being kinder... for a while anyways く(^_・)ゝ
1)
I loved Xavi as a footballer, but I don't care if Xavi was the brain of Pep's Barca.
I have already told you and other Xavi goers:
Logical fallacy 'If X was a WC player, then he would be a WC coach'
So, no it proves shit.
Xavi has to show that he is capable of sth even remotely similar to Pep's career.
2) No, you are misconstruing the reality on purpose.
No, we don't have as only options EV and that type of caoches OR Xavi
That's a fake dilemma put forward by Xavi fanboys to push an agenda.
I listed names already. If Flick or Ten Haag can be lured to Barca, then you do that.
Let's not go into circles.
Must be one of the closest polls I've seen on here.
The one with Pep's 2011 Barca vs recent Bayern and Liverpool was the closest. :coffee:
Comparing Pep's barca with these two teams :lol: