8 - Pedri

Saladin said:

Comparing him to Xavi in his prime is the dumbest shit I have ever heard. He is right now at the level of Guti (who was a straight baller) - could he reach Xavi's ICONIC level?

Of course. Pedri is world-class, but as of now this statement is laughable at best.

Click to expand...

Nah Guti was someone like Olmo when they are both on. Splendid footballers but luxury players that have huge systematic defenciencies.

Pedri comes up with Xavi and Iniesta, purely because Pedri is an incredibly rounded midfielder, that has traits of both without the excessive quality of either.

In a way he is what you would get if you merged Xavi and Iniesta, and got the median version of boths characterics, without the peaks of boths abilities. Iniesta's creative dribbling and acceleration, and Xavi's passing consistency, selection and assertiveness.

Pedri has both without excelling in either, a very good engine with better defensive actions than both, but without Xavi's defensive positioning.

How good

Iniesta
Xavi
Messi
Busquets
Alves

Were at their best doesn't fully dawn on a few people; most are aware, but a minority don't fully understand.

There is a reason why Madrid grew after the decline of Xavi, Iniesta, Busquets, and Dani Alves. They all declined at slightly different times but almost back to back.

90% of football to this day is, in some way, a reaction to that Barcelona. Teams either tried to copy it or do the opposite of it to prove there were other ways to win.

There is a reason Madrid went for Alonso, Modrić, Kroos, and even they couldn't stand up to Iniesta and Xavi, and only started to win after their decline & Barto being fucking retarded.

The internet is just getting flooded with kids who didn't even watch Pep's Barca and are now underestimating the legends.

Xavi&Iniesta dominated league,CL,EURO,WC and in all finals they were unplayable. Until Pedri does the same he is clearly not on their level. Pedri and Kdb are probably the best after them in this generation

Porque said:

We haven't seen Pedri's peak yet. But we know that Iniesta for a short period, and Xavi for a slightly longer period, were the best midfielders in the world when they reached theirs.

And I mean by that, leading club and country to World Cup, Euros and Champions League. Yes it is not all about trophy count, but that is the measure that they achieved.

Now, the more interesting discussion is where do Xavi and Iniesta fit in, in modern football. Football where today we have moved past the midfield three horizontally aligned (well, except PSG) and to a more vertically positioned midfield with double pivots in the 4231.

Would Xavi-Iniesta function as a modern day double pivot?
Would Iniesta have to be the AMC? And if he was, is he naturally productive enough being consistently positioned more advanced? A bit like Pedri.

So yeah, interesting in terms of Flicks system. Obviously (to me) in LEs system then Xavi easily ousts Vitinha as he does everything he does but better. While Iniesta goes in for Ruiz even if you lose a bit of athletism.

Click to expand...

it would function like it did for Spain in 2008. That's the blueprint. Xavi and Iniesta would not be able to dominate as much in midfield without a false 9 like peak Messi takingcare of everything offensive in the last third. Both would go up more often, and this means you'd need a DM who is stronger in duels, like a Marcos Senna. Actually 2009 is a good shout also, with Yaya as the physically dominant midfielder. Xavi was an assist machine in that season with more freedome to move up.

TheStig said:

The internet is just getting flooded with kids who didn't even watch Pep's Barca and are now underestimating the legends.

Click to expand...

No one is underestimating anyone other than people are underestimating current Pedri.

He is consistently playing near flawless football, never cheating in defence and consistently playing the ball into areas where his teammates are capable of creating something. You can't do much more as a midfielder when playing for a team who has spent less in half a decade than some teams in one summer. There is no dancing around the fact how much better team Pep's Barca was compared to Barca teams Pedri has been in.

I don't know, maybe some of you have your nostalgia glasses on when remembering Xavi and Iniesta but they weren't some god like entities which no mere mortal can touch. They had massive help from teammates to become as dominant in their position as they became.

Once everything is said and done for Pedri, he will be remembered in similar way than those two above. He is 22. He will get his World Cups, his UCLs and constant votes in the top-10 in b'Dor voting. He will continue to get his name chanted and he will standing ovations when he is subbed off. People will mourn when his time is up in Barcelona.

At that point it's just pitiful and pure stubborness to act like he hasn't done enough to be spoken in same sentence than some other football legends before him.

He quite literally hasn't. He wins some CLs and a World Cup as a midfield general, he will.

How about he proves himself vs Vitinha first and leave the Xavi comparisons for later eh?

Vitinha is affirming himself as the no1 midfielder of his generation in the last 18 months. First Pedri must cement himself as the best of his peers. Getting dominated by a crippled PSG at home is not a great sign.

Iniesta won man of match in WC, Euros and CL final.

He's not won as much nor he Is as talented as those two, period end of discussion.

He's 22 ffs & being compared to Iniesta & Xavi 😂😂.

At least wait until he's 28.

GloryHunter 007 said:

Iniesta won man of match in WC, Euros and CL final.

Click to expand...

👏👏

serghei said:

How about he proves himself vs Vitinha first and leave the Xavi comparisons for later eh?

Vitinha is affirming himself as the no1 midfielder of his generation in the last 18 months. First Pedri must cement himself as the best of his peers. Getting dominated by a crippled PSG at home is not a great sign.

Click to expand...

Pretty much this.

Well to be fair to Pedri, it was 1 against 3, because de jong & olmo were useless.

Nations league was a much better context & it was about equal for both.

Folk love to just make things up.

Pedri was poor v PSG.

Gave away ball badly and sloppily too many times and was far too slow trying to close them down.

None of the midfielders played well.

Vitinha was better than all of them and he didnt have much great beside him either that game.

This season he is getting dribbled past far too easily.

Teams are also man marking him and FDJ and showing ball out to Barcas full backs. They are pressuring the midfield with space and targetting likes of Kounde and Gerard.

Comparing him to Iniesta is ridiculous
Even Iniesta at 22 was bossing it in the 2006 UCL final btw ppl…

He has suffered as teams are man marking him and FDJ.

They can do this when Scez is in goals.. as he is shit on ball and when the likes of Kounde, Araujo and Gerard are poor on ball and being targetted.

Also when there are statues like Lewa up top who is not threat in behind and teams can press high much more easily.

While the front line among them all been taking a lot of risks and next to never holding ball up or bringing game up park.

When have better GK on ball, Balde fit, Cubarsi at RCB, Raphinha making runs in behind and more of a threat with that perceived threat it should make it more difficult for teams to focus on Barcas midfield as much as doing at moment.