Ah, yea true.
@Birdy What do Liverpool's analysts say?
Analyst are below, and dependent, on the SD.
Richard Hughes has been the SD since summer of 2024, after Jurgen left.
He has done a terrible job in 5 (summer and winter) transfer windows.
And I am not referring to the big money spent on Isak, Wirtz, and now Barcola. That might actually be the only correct things he did, as I think all of them might come out good at the end in the right environment. I am referring to his inability to address glaring holes in Liverpool's squad, like DM who has been vacant since Fabinho left, and bad recruitment in other positions with the likes of Kerkez Frimpong Mamardasvili and others, who are all below par for the standards required.
When Edwards was the SD (until 2021 or so) you would never see that. They also had misses back then (like Keita), but they were drops in the ocean of stellar recruitment. (Yes, I know Edwards hired Hughes at Pool after he returned, but they are not the same person, and have to be judged separately).
Last but not least, Hughes has agreed a deal to become the SD of Al Hilal since last winter. Yet, he continues to work as Liverpool's SD this summer, while 'overseeing' tranfer business of Al Hilal from distance before he officially joins. Isn't this a conspicuous conflict of interest?
How do FSG allow that?