Politiking

fake9 said:
I will not take responsibility for the crimes of their creation, like Christian Europe, and I am not accusing them of wanting to targhet us just because they hate Christianity (some clergymen). It's their internal wars. I will prefer for them to build their utopia in ME and Yankistan and leave Europe for good along side their sect of Christianity that enslaved us in a paranoid culture about doomsday and hating life. Everyone has the right to just disengage and go their own ways. The legacy of the Roman Empire should be crushed and that of Alexander and we should focus more on Central Asia and Europe not ME.
Click to expand...
fake9 said:
I do care about the conservation of Europeans and their freedom to choose their economic path, their borders.
Click to expand...
fake9 said:
You base your whole existence on being the true virtuous Jew and scorning Orthodox Jews.
Click to expand...
fake9 said:
I don't really care, you can hate eachothers but for me Christianity is occupation and you are all Jews squabbling for power over your common past.
Click to expand...
This doesn't come together all that well, isn't it.
I read to that point and called it a day with you.

You haven't yet stated what are you, if you distance yourself from Christendom and white culture. A random ethnic pagan? An international atheist? A truly atomized individual man of no attachments (yeah, that will work great for retaining European interests)?

You're either seriously delusional/ignorant or... what color of mud are you exactly? Another gupta/jeet? A muslim. A jew? You're not one of ours, that's for certain. Not even libshit whitey shabbos goyim talk this way. :lol:




edit:
This can be stopped only by abandoning the links with Yanks, economic embargo on them to fester the poverty needed to sharpen your hunger to fight and a take over of EU to create a paneuropean alliance and of course blatant tribalistic enlightenment.
Click to expand...
Are you using LLMs to make your texts? Because lot of what you blabber makes no sense or is really kinda vague and shallow. I see your posts on football and while you're not among my favorite posters there, at least i see some point. But what is this?
Yeah, fucking off Usrael influence would be good, but what does "create a paneuropean alliance and of course blatant tribalistic enlightenment" entail? Did you construct that sentence yourself?
 
Last edited:
Tempt is a jew-jeet alliance grifter. Brown shitskins are very aligned to jewish parasites in the West. Any of his posts and retweets should be seen through this lens. Islam isn't the problem on and off itself. Muslims and jeets/guptas are here only because of jews. Remove the jew, easily remove the invaders. That's what white patriots of the West should be schooled at first hand.
 
Jamologist said:
This doesn't come together all that well, isn't it.
I read to that point and called it a day with you.

You haven't yet stated what are you, if you distance yourself from Christendom and white culture. A random ethnic pagan? An international atheist? A truly atomized individual man of no attachments (yeah, that will work great for retaining European interests)?

You're either seriously delusional/ignorant or... what color of mud are you exactly? Another gupta/jeet? A muslim. A jew? You're not one of ours, that's for certain. Not even libshit whitey shabbos goyim talk this way. :lol:




edit:

Are you using LLMs to make your texts? Because lot of what you blabber makes no sense or is really kinda vague and shallow. I see your posts on football and while you're not among my favorite posters there, at least i see some point. But what is this?
Yeah, fucking off Usrael influence would be good, but what does "create a paneuropean alliance and of course blatant tribalistic enlightenment" entail? Did you construct that sentence yourself?
Click to expand...
There is no white culture besides Germanic culture and that is mostly Christian thus Jewish. Italy, Spain, Balkans except parts of Croatia, most of Hungary, France, Romania, parts of Ukraine are not white or Indo-European in any shape KKK or nazis understand as White. Anatolian Farmers are the main ancestors there, even where the WHG or CW male lines are dominant. Balts, Eastern Slavs, Poles, Czecs, Irish are white but not of the "proper" race based on any book from XIX century you could find in their library about whites or "Aryans" and they were dominated by Germanics from IV century.
There is no point in debating that because that's a fact. We had a Anatolian age, then a Germanic age after Christianity crushed the spirit of Rome, Sparta, Celtic Europe.

Whites are mostly where the WHG female DNA gave 30-45 of the DNA by a coincidence in the mix. You claim to be European but you speak in a language that is foreign to Europe except for people raised on US forums with US culture.

There you have whites, blacks, browns.
In Europe we have Slavs, Germans, Latin, Balkanic, Ugric people etc and a general mix that the WHG, Steppe and ANF produced and we call it European. It's an average, not a race.

I don't want to protect an illusive race that is relevant for 300 plants or delusional people, I want to protect Europeans. If they are whiter or superior as you claim it's a non factor for me. They could have been idiots, brown and evil, I would have cared less.
You try too much to produce an emotional bolliwood drama that is patetic. You can't save a continent by being cry babies and virtue signaling superiority and misticism. That's how you win Miss Venezuela, not following from people with brains.

You are either pro European or pro White, there aren't synonyms. Make your mind then we can argue. If you are pro white then you must be pro Germans and your race is ... based on their theories.

Europe needs proper politics not neo Jewish ramblings about demons and Yank theories about races.
If you are Christian then you are of Jewish culture, part of their nation. The Christian Nation was a thing for over 1600 years like the Islamic Nation.
My point is, I don't care if Christians hate Jews or Jews hate Christians, they are Jews both of them. You pray to a Jew god and a bunch of Jews, you have Jewish laws, a Jewish history etc. If you want to be specific Christianity is the left wing of Jewishnes and the others are the Right Wing. That's why Christianity is abandoned in US for more Right wing Jewishness like the Evanghelical C. or whatever their name is.

So my answers are non consistent because your political identity is missing. European, White, Christian and antisemite are mutually exclusive. A Latvian can be white, European, Christian and antisemite because individuals can have contradicting identities. Political movements with contradicting identities are there for making money, are plants or naive that end up bringing up the doomsday they feared like the nazis on Germany.

I don't have a following, I don't try to have one, I just advice close people on this things since the propaganda is from all parts and I know the truth behind.
I gave you some feedback you being passionate or excited. You can ignore it, I care less to win arguments or convince people.
 
mc_lovin said:
Have these fuckers never heard of the Islamic Republic of Pakistan? They have nukes. And are islamic :lol:

Right wing grifters gonna grift. And retards gobble it up.
Click to expand...
They are not grifting, they lead the right wing Tommys as their left counterparts lead the left wing Starmers. It's a civil war inside their culture. European culture is dominated by Yanks military and mediatic and by their religion and movements, ngos
Grifters are people with no power not people that lead both the right and left.
Bibi is the leader of the European right the American Jewish intelligencia leads the left softer by doctrinal impulses. That's a fact. Most antibibi ramblings come from the US Jewish left most antimuslim ramblings from Evanghelical Jews or Orthodox ones.
 
fake9 said:
There is no white culture besides Germanic culture and that is mostly Christian thus Jewish. Italy, Spain, Balkans except parts of Croatia, most of Hungary, France, Romania, parts of Ukraine are not white or Indo-European in any shape KKK or nazis understand as White. Anatolian Farmers are the main ancestors there, even where the WHG or CW male lines are dominant. Balts, Eastern Slavs, Poles, Czecs, Irish are white but not of the "proper" race based on any book from XIX century you could find in their library about whites or "Aryans" and they were dominated by Germanics from IV century.
There is no point in debating that because that's a fact. We had a Anatolian age, then a Germanic age after Christianity crushed the spirit of Rome, Sparta, Celtic Europe.

Whites are mostly where the WHG female DNA gave 30-45 of the DNA by a coincidence in the mix. You claim to be European but you speak in a language that is foreign to Europe except for people raised on US forums with US culture.

There you have whites, blacks, browns.
In Europe we have Slavs, Germans, Latin, Balkanic, Ugric people etc and a general mix that the WHG, Steppe and ANF produced and we call it European. It's an average, not a race.

I don't want to protect an illusive race that is relevant for 300 plants or delusional people, I want to protect Europeans. If they are whiter or superior as you claim it's a non factor for me. They could have been idiots, brown and evil, I would have cared less.
You try too much to produce an emotional bolliwood drama that is patetic. You can't save a continent by being cry babies and virtue signaling superiority and misticism. That's how you win Miss Venezuela, not following from people with brains.

You are either pro European or pro White, there aren't synonyms. Make your mind then we can argue. If you are pro white then you must be pro Germans and your race is ... based on their theories.

Europe needs proper politics not neo Jewish ramblings about demons and Yank theories about races.
If you are Christian then you are of Jewish culture, part of their nation. The Christian Nation was a thing for over 1600 years like the Islamic Nation.
My point is, I don't care if Christians hate Jews or Jews hate Christians, they are Jews both of them. You pray to a Jew god and a bunch of Jews, you have Jewish laws, a Jewish history etc. If you want to be specific Christianity is the left wing of Jewishnes and the others are the Right Wing. That's why Christianity is abandoned in US for more Right wing Jewishness like the Evanghelical C. or whatever their name is.

So my answers are non consistent because your political identity is missing. European, White, Christian and antisemite are mutually exclusive. A Latvian can be white, European, Christian and antisemite because individuals can have contradicting identities. Political movements with contradicting identities are there for making money, are plants or naive that end up bringing up the doomsday they feared like the nazis on Germany.

I don't have a following, I don't try to have one, I just advice close people on this things since the propaganda is from all parts and I know the truth behind.
I gave you some feedback you being passionate or excited. You can ignore it, I care less to win arguments or convince people.
Click to expand...
What I find amazing is that people like him, once pagans converted by the sword of Tuetonic Knights in the Middle Ages, usurp themselves a pole position in the NAZI race theory - as if they were Aryans themselves and what is more amazing, make themselves sound as if they were Christianity or European values defenders. They are white by the skin complexion but they hardly look like an Aryan model NAZIs had in mind and even by the mere anthropological characteristics, they are not even close.

I see a certain pattern here. These ex Soviet Republics are missing their national identity element defined by the history of their countries or lands. Baltic states. Belarus. Ukraine... They did not even exist as countries - states until 1990s but were, at the most, distinct people living in their geographical regions. Thus, hating on Jews is their sweet tasting addiction, which in certain ways, helps them to patch up their national self esteem insecurities of being historically undefined.
Ukraine is the best example. They aspire to join E.U. and NATO. They want all kinds of aid and at same time they are promoting their own WW2 pro NAZI scumbags (Bandera Shukievic, Mylnyk, Stecko...), as their national heros. Why? They hardly have anybody else.
Sometimes, it seems as if it is Putin who is on the right side of the conflict.
 
Last edited:
TemporaryFan said:
What I find amazing is that people like him, once pagans converted by the sword of Tuetonic Knights in the Middle Ages, usurp themselves a pole position in the NAZI race theory - as if they were Aryans themselves and what is more amazing, make themselves sound as if they were Christianic European values defenders. They are white by the skin complexion but they hardly look like an Aryan model NAZIs had in mind and even by the mere anthropological characteristics, they are not even close.

I see a certain pattern here. These ex Soviet Republics are missing their national identity element defined by the history of their countries or lands. Baltic states. Belarus. Ukraine... They did not even exist as countries - states until 1990s but were, at the most, distinct people living in their geographical regions. Thus, hating on Jews is their sweet tasting addiction, which in certain ways, helps them to patch up their national self esteem insecurities of being historically undefined.
Ukraine is the best example. They aspire to join E.U. and NATO. They want all kinds of aid and at same time they are promoting their own pro NAZI scumbags (Bandera Shukievic, Mylnyk, Stecko...), as their national heros. Sometimes, it seems as if it is Putin who is on the right side of the conflict.
Click to expand...
I don't want to turn it into a flame war about persons or specific nations so we can argue the origins. The fact is most of Europe was antiJewish due to a rivalry at the start of the Jewish cultural split. Thus the Church who is a rebel Jewish movement who hated the Orthodox Jews with a passion(as the opposite is true). So that's one pillar.
The second pillar that influenced a bit the Austrian was Imperial explotation of the peasants by Russians, Austrians and Prussians. Jews were seen as imperial elements, so were the Ukrainians for Poles or the Slovaks for Hungarians. And Eastern Europe being agrarian saw everything not agrarian as an exploitation of the fellow farmer, peasant. And Exploitation wasn't uncommon due to monopoly on power or certain industries.
I don't think it's irrational for a peasant with a hard life to view enemies everywhere. Then since schools were paid the peasant children were finding a hard way to get into universities, so the sentiment changed from a resource based struggle to scietific emancipation of the nation(aka peasants).

That was the basic thinking for the young right wing then for the anarchists and ultimately for the Soviets. Soviets were assimilated and produced quite monolithic cultures.
In the west the conditions were different but even there the French had their movements. UK probably is the only exception due to a confusion between nation and oligarchy.
Yes, in Latvia the oligarchy was either German or Russian so there was nothing between raw sentiments and the people like in UK where every idea is watered down to fit the common narrative.
Collapse of the Soviet Union was more the collapse of a decorum, those sentiments existed inside the political circles and before the Soviets.
 
To clarify.
What is known as Russia started in Kiev in the Middle Ages and then shifted and expended over the centuries to what is Russia today. Ukraine is the geographical region of the Russian cultural origin. The region of which portions belonged to various entities over the ages, depending on the war outcomes.
 
fake9 said:
I don't want to turn it into a flame war about persons or specific nations so we can argue the origins. The fact is most of Europe was antiJewish due to a rivalry at the start of the Jewish cultural split. Thus the Church who is a rebel Jewish movement who hated the Orthodox Jews with a passion(as the opposite is true). So that's one pillar.
The second pillar that influenced a bit the Austrian was Imperial explotation of the peasants by Russians, Austrians and Prussians. Jews were seen as imperial elements, so were the Ukrainians for Poles or the Slovaks for Hungarians. And Eastern Europe being agrarian saw everything not agrarian as an exploitation of the fellow farmer, peasant. And Exploitation wasn't uncommon due to monopoly on power or certain industries.
I don't think it's irrational for a peasant with a hard life to view enemies everywhere. Then since schools were paid the peasant children were finding a hard way to get into universities, so the sentiment changed from a resource based struggle to scietific emancipation of the nation(aka peasants).

That was the basic thinking for the young right wing then for the anarchists and ultimately for the Soviets. Soviets were assimilated and produced quite monolithic cultures.
In the west the conditions were different but even there the French had their movements. UK probably is the only exception due to a confusion between nation and oligarchy.
Yes, in Latvia the oligarchy was either German or Russian so there was nothing between raw sentiments and the people like in UK where every idea is watered down to fit the common narrative.
Collapse of the Soviet Union was more the collapse of a decorum, those sentiments existed inside the political circles and before the Soviets.
Click to expand...

I am not ranting against specific nations in a general sense but in the context of the last few pages.
Nazis Propaganda defined Poles as untermensch.. Poles are Central European Slavs, of the same stock as Czechs or Russians (and their cousins Ukrainians).
Now, Ukrainians adored NAZIs bringing them hope of state independence. NAZIS did not call Ukrainians untermensh.
Now, If I am an untermensh, per their race theory, so is a Ukrainian, a Czech or a Russian. Something does not stick here.
I hate fucking NAZIs and their race theories which is not to say I am pro open border, multikulti Europe either.
Healthy balance and proportions...see and judge people as they come but not by the race.
 
Jamologist said:
edit:

Are you using LLMs to make your texts? Because lot of what you blabber makes no sense or is really kinda vague and shallow. I see your posts on football and while you're not among my favorite posters there, at least i see some point. But what is this?
Yeah, fucking off Usrael influence would be good, but what does "create a paneuropean alliance and of course blatant tribalistic enlightenment" entail? Did you construct that sentence yourself?
Click to expand...
Are you not using that thing yourself, whatever it is?
Not too long ago, up until the crash of the old forum, your texts of more than one paragraph were completely unreadable. Stylistically heavy, full of unnecessary neologissms and too convoluted to get the point.
You seem to have slightly improved but that's still too much of out of the blue improvement. Are you using text massaging tools nowadays?
 
TemporaryFan said:
I am not ranting against specific nations in a general sense but in the context of the last few pages.
Nazis Propaganda defined Poles as untermensch.. Poles are Central European Slavs, of the same stock as Czechs or Russians (and their cousins Ukrainians).
Now, Ukrainians adored NAZIs bringing them hope of state independence. NAZIS did not call Ukrainians untermensh.
Now, If I am an untermensh, per their race theory, so is a Ukrainian, a Czech or a Russian. Something does not stick here.
I hate fucking NAZIs and their race theories which is not to say I am pro open border, multikulti Europe either.
Healthy balance and proportions...see and judge people as they come but not by the race.
Click to expand...
You are correct. Race theory was linked to language groups and politics. Nazis were no pro White bulshit or pro European. They wanted a caste system like in India to be correct, but some pro European propaganda existed and for sure Brits were equal in their eyes just a bit under them.

The whole inferiority vs superiority thing stems from "we dominated the Slavs", "we have industry" etc thus we shall be dominant and we are racially superior. That was the case for French too for a period, Hungarians had a similar theory. People saw in political realities genetic atributes. That's why crying you are superior is very stupid to me because in the end superior is the one who wins or prosper.
There was no white race in Europe. There was the concept of Europeans who was an old concept based on Christian and Roman shared things and the concept of European races/ethnic groups. Nazis and Yanks ultimately exaggerated. I mean Yanks still have the pre Nazi mentality = material superior means superior. Saw some videos where they butchered Iraqis like dogs cuz poor sand niggers, you can see them in Europe thinking they are superior beings for having money.
I don't want to enter into the predestination, but that is a big pillar of feeling superior along side a powerful political position. The other things, like measurements of skulls etc, were there to confirm their conclusions that they should keep the power for themselves. :)
 
Last edited:
Now, since Europe is irrelevant in world politics, I don't find amusing some things, like planting politicians, funding an imperial education, the necessity of making Latvia part of the imperial world. That is insult to injury and brings no benefit for Europeans.

The empires moved into Asia and Americas thus the issues of diversity should move there. I don't see why someone has to argue that a Latvian can't be racist in Latvia and all Europeans should open their borders because reasons. No, go fuck yourself to China and US who controls your life and make there your global capitalist or socialist utopia, race wars for power. Europe is back in the tribalistic age especially after Christianity is dead. It would be fun to be allies not to end up like Afghanistan or Armenia but that's all Europeans should take care.
 
fake9 said:
You are correct. Race theory was linked to language groups and politics. Nazis were no pro White bulshit or pro European. They wanted a caste system like in India to be correct, but some pro European propaganda existed and for sure Brits were equal in their eyes just a bit under them.

The whole inferiority vs superiority thing stems from "we dominated the Slavs", "we have industry" etc thus we shall be dominant and we are racially superior. That was the case for French too for a period, Hungarians had a similar theory. People saw in political realities genetic atributes. That's why crying you are superior is very stupid to me because in the end superior is the one who wins or prosper.
There was no white race in Europe. There was the concept of Europeans who was an old concept based on Christian and Roman shared things and the concept of European races/ethnic groups. Nazis and Yanks ultimately exaggerated. I mean Yanks still have the pre Nazi mentality = material superior means superior. Saw some videos where they butchered Iraqis like dogs cuz poor sand niggers, you can see them in Europe thinking they are superior beings for having money.
I don't want to enter into the predestination, but that is a big pillar of feeling superior along side a powerful political position. The other things, like measurements of skulls etc, were there to confirm their conclusions that they should keep the power for themselves. :)
Click to expand...
It is simple.
Those Aryans and pseudo Aryans 😉 won't win their racial Kampf by bashing Jews and exposing their however surreal subversive schemes unless they make more blue eye, blond hair babies.
Have you made any white hair blue eye Balts yet @Jamologist ...?
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top