11 - Raphinha

We been linked with Maza but I think it plays more centrally.
Watched him last night against Argentina.
I dont see much in him, not 50m worth atleast, and no way he can replace Olmo/Fermin.

Maybe I am wrong, and it was because Argentina was quite superior and dint give time on the ball because of their press.
 
Hypothetically, if Raphinha goes to Saudi, we should sell for a minimum of 120m. And not a cent lower than that.

Using the funds to get Yildiz/Barcola plus a future striker like Espi or Panichelli would be a good deal. And we still go for a striker like Osimhen/Pedro.
Not ideal as Rapha is leaving, but we probably wont get anything close to 120m in 2027 and beyond.
 
Hypothetically, if Raphinha goes to Saudi, we should sell for a minimum of 120m. And not a cent lower than that.

Using the funds to get Yildiz/Barcola plus a future striker like Espi or Panichelli would be a good deal. And we still go for a striker like Osimhen/Pedro.
Not ideal as Rapha is leaving, but we probably wont get anything close to 120m in 2027 and beyond.
Barcola and Yildiz are absolute shit compared to Diomande.

He needs to be our first target.
 
If he asks to leave and we would get enough to actually get Alvarez I would be ok with selling him.

Maybe we'll let him go for free as we like to do with guys who go to Saudi? Charity FC
 
Hypothetically, if Raphinha goes to Saudi, we should sell for a minimum of 120m. And not a cent lower than that.

Using the funds to get Yildiz/Barcola plus a future striker like Espi or Panichelli would be a good deal. And we still go for a striker like Osimhen/Pedro.
Not ideal as Rapha is leaving, but we probably wont get anything close to 120m in 2027 and beyond.

We already signed the Raphinha replacement if he leaves, we won't buy another expensive winger alongside a striker.
 
Maybe that is reason why we bought Gordon, he is same player as Rapinha, in terms of style.

I remember one juornalist saying one big name will leave on summer, and it will be painful...But on other hand Rapinha said like he will not go...So who knows, maybe he have some doubts.

If he goes, and we can't get Alvarez, it could be tricky.

Also I would not even like to get Alvarez for anything more then 120mil, and that is already to much.
 
That's the problem, Raphinha thinks he's better than he actually is and probably wouldn't want to leave right now. He can stay put another year and then he has all the bargaining power.
 
That's the problem, Raphinha thinks he's better than he actually is and probably wouldn't want to leave right now. He can stay put another year and then he has all the bargaining power.

Lets be honest, his cl season 2 seasons ago was brutal, it will be extremely difficult to find a replacement for him
 
Looks average with Brazil tbh.
Actually the game yesterday suited his style, he was just unlucky with the offside.
Otherwise the game yesterday also had all the hallmarks of why it would be wise to sell now. His game is heavily influenced by his pressing, same pressing that gets him injured + he lacks finesse in his finishing. Too much of a system player to be on the same level as Vinicius, even if he can produce great numbers in the right system.
 
If it's the hamstring... you know.

I still stand by this:
Personally I have nothing against an extension, but only under one condition. A highly performance based contract. He'll be 30 this year and the first thing players lose with age, are their stamina and legs in general, the biggest strength of Rapha. If we give him a new 5 year contract with close to 20m/y salary without performance conditions, the club will do the same mistake as with the amigos. So as long as he's still highly important and plays on the level, everything is okay. But once he starts to run less, get more injured, his salary should follow accordingly and then it won't hurt to bench him if necessary.
 
Back
Top