It was a myth particularly on here.
Every young player for Real was seen as some world class replacement ready to step up and was never going to be the case. They have barely signed a player that has improved the starting eleven in years.
Real were constantly held up as having great planning and succession when was never going to be case that the old core would be replaced like that.
Barely signing players for the short term is not something to be held against a club. Instead it's the bad choices of long contracts to players who grew pissed off at not being featured as long as they'd like to.
Myth was that every player would succeed. That was the real myth. Getting them is not a problem, assuming they'll be a success and that manager will get the best out of everyone is.
It was clear that is what was meant. Wolfe has a bit of a chip on his shoulder about EPL.
Not a fan of monopolies is all. It's not like it's become a monopoly for a good reason either. Only through the wealth and invention inequality. If internet originated in France or Spain, it'd be very different.
Paying such a huge fee for a player like Hazard at that age and who was never seen as a great trainer is not really so much bad luck.
All teams have injuries and blunders.
It isnt seen as bad luck for Dembele injuries at Barca or when if a player fucks up in a big game.
I agree about Hazard and paying a fee. Didn't want him in the first place.
But injuries are terrible luck with a player who never suffered them and curbed anything positive he could and by all means club counted, should have, offered.
These guys don't have a single decent goalscorer except for Benzema.
