User Tag List

View Poll Results: Coutinho or Griezmann?

Voters
76. You may not vote on this poll
  • Coutinho

    48 63.16%
  • Griezmann

    28 36.84%
Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 36

Thread: Coutinho or Griezmann

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Raketa10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,587
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Coutinho or Griezmann

    If you could buy only one of them, who would you choose and why?
    Last edited by Raketa10; 16th November 2017 at 10:51 AM.

  2. #2
    New signing

    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I can't See how we could accommodate Griezmann into our starting 11, so I'll go with Coutinho. Even though I am not the biggest fan of him, he would be perfect as a LM in a 4231.

  3. #3
    Barcaman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Where the water is warm, the drinks are cold... and I don't know the names of the players.
    Posts
    26,227
    Blog Entries
    1
    Mentioned
    6 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Griezmann. With Suarez regaining himself uncertain we need a forward even more than a midfielder. Another plus is he is from La Liga and would integrate more easily. Also, he wouldn't be another obstacle in front of Alena.

    Ideally though, we spend that money on someone younger, harder worker,faster and scorer at that.
    Can't afford to have 2 forwards who don't work hard off the ball.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Ousmane Dembélé's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Posts
    1,123
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Sell Suarez, Gomes, Arda, Verm, Vidal etc and get both.

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Raketa10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,587
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    I sincerely doubt both will come. They could, but than we will have to rotate heavily in every single game since there is no way Messi, Suarez, Dembele, Coutinho and Griezmann can play at the same time.

    RW/RM is taken by Dembele, Central postion or second striker is taken by Messi and CF by Suarez. So if Suarez stays there is only room in LW position in 4-2-3-1 or AM in 4-3-3 system or LM in 4-4-2 system and Griezmann in not suitable for any of those positions.

    This is the reason I would prefer Coutinho since he can play LM, LW and AM while Griezmann can play only as striker or winger. Griezmann is also left footed so IMHO he would be better on RW and than you have to move Demebele to the left. I like both of them but if Suarez stays and regains his form I have no doubt that Coutinho is better choice for us right now. Biggest problem with Coutinho is that he is injury prone.

    That being said if Suarez continues to play like this and if we sell him I would go for both of them in a heartbeat.
    Last edited by Raketa10; 16th November 2017 at 02:29 PM.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Vilarrubi's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2014
    Posts
    1,453
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Would LOVE both, Coutinho taking Iniestas place eventually.. and Griezmann/Messi/Dembele up front is amazing!

  7. #7
    Senior Member
    Windhook's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2017
    Posts
    1,103
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Griezmann. Coutinho is overpriced, we have Paulinho!

  8. #8
    New signing

    Join Date
    Jul 2017
    Posts
    35
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Makes no sense discussing about Players if it is not clear which role they would Play and what the Manager has planned for them.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Raketa10's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2015
    Posts
    2,587
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by GoodKid View Post
    Makes no sense discussing about Players if it is not clear which role they would Play and what the Manager has planned for them.
    Why not? Isn't this the purpose of a forum?

  10. #10
    New signing

    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Gotham
    Posts
    48
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Both
    Griez 100m
    Cou 120m

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    ronniecro's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2014
    Posts
    502
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    they want more than 150m for coutinho
    griezmann's buyout clause is reportedly 100m,i'd go for griezmann

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Kohe321's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Posts
    2,929
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Easy, the answer is always the player with "inho" in his name.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    aaron101's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Posts
    1,203
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by Kohe321 View Post
    Easy, the answer is always the player with "inho" in his name.
    the name with inho is going to psg though

  14. #14
    Improvin' Perfection!!
    Aryagorn's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Posts
    8,165
    Mentioned
    0 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Quote Originally Posted by aaron101 View Post
    the name with inho is going to psg though
    Lord Paulinho shouldn't be sold for anything less than 100m!

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    dakt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2014
    Location
    Croatia
    Posts
    5,418
    Mentioned
    4 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)
    Not sure. We need both. We cannot create/connect without a wc midfielder and we cannot depend on only Messi scoring, so a wc goal scorer would benefit us as well.
    Since we must choose one and there's still a chance for Suarez's resurection, I'll pick Coutinho, but for a fair price.

    Hmm...rethinking the problem again, having a wc goal scorer and some awkward Valverde's chemistry in the midfield, might provides us with more chances then putting our whole faith in one guy to solve our MF issues..........hard to choose, but I'll stick with my first choice.